Scope of the Housing Lease Protection Act: When Are You Protected?
Based on 31 consultation cases · Updated · Translated from the Korean original.
Whether the Housing Lease Protection Act applies is not determined solely by the designation in the building register or land registry. It is determined by considering, among other things, the building’s structure and actual use when the lease was made. However, the fact that the premises were used for residential purposes is not by itself sufficient; the purpose of the lease, whether the tenant actually resided there, and whether the person who entered into the lease had authority to lease the premises must also be considered.
At a glance

Key points
- Whether a building is residential is determined by its actual use rather than its designation in official records. If it is used for both residential and business purposes, the purpose of the lease, the structure and form of the building and leased portion, the actual use of the premises, and whether people lead their daily lives there are considered together (Examples 1, 13, 19, 20).
- Even where premises are used for both residential and business purposes, the Act may apply if the actual living space is substantial and serves as the tenant’s home. It may not apply if the residential use is merely incidental to the business or the residential portion is very small (Examples 13, 19, 20).
- The Act may apply to an unregistered or unauthorized building, or to a building designated in official records as a factory, warehouse, or similar facility, if it is actually a residential building. However, the premises must have been configured for residential use when the lease was made; if the tenant independently converted them after the lease, the Act may not apply unless there are special circumstances, such as the landlord’s consent (Examples 2, 4, 10, 21).
- Spaces such as rooftop rooms that do not appear in the building register or land registry may also be protected if they were configured for residential use when the lease was made and were actually leased and used as a residence (Example 4).
- A foreign national may receive protection by completing foreign resident registration and reporting a change of place of stay, which take the place of resident registration and a move-in report. The examples also describe an overseas Korean’s domestic residence report as a procedure that takes the place of resident registration (Example 3, 6; Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3, Paragraph 1 (주택임대차보호법 제3조 제1항); Immigration Act, Article 88-2 (출입국관리법 제88조의2)).
- If a small or medium-sized enterprise leases a home for an employee to live in, the corporation may acquire enforceability against third parties if an employee selected by the corporation takes delivery of the home and completes resident registration (Examples 8, 23; Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3, Paragraph 3 (주택임대차보호법 제3조 제3항)).
- The Act may apply even if the landlord is not the registered owner, provided the landlord has legal authority to lease the property. By contrast, a tenant cannot obtain a right to priority in repayment if they entered into a lease with someone who lacked legal authority to lease, such as the highest bidder at an auction (Examples 14, 17).
- A lease found to have been primarily intended not for residential purposes but for debt recovery or abuse of the minimum-priority repayment system may not qualify for protection as a small-amount tenant (Examples 15, 16; Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 8 (주택임대차보호법 제8조)).
Frequently asked questions
Q. Does it apply if I use part of a shop or office as a home?
It may apply. The determination is made by considering the purpose of the lease, the building’s structure and area, how it is used, and whether people lead their daily lives there, based on its actual use rather than its designated use in official records. However, it may not apply if the sleeping area or kitchen is merely incidental to the business, or if the residential portion is very small.
Q. Can unregistered or unauthorized homes, or rooftop rooms, be protected?
A building is not excluded from coverage solely because it is unregistered or lacks a building permit. If it is actually used as a residence, the Act may apply to unregistered or unauthorized buildings, as well as rooftop rooms not shown in official records. However, it is necessary to consider whether the building was configured for residential use when the lease was made and how it was actually being used.
Q. If I rent a factory or warehouse and convert it for residential use, will the Act apply?
At the time the lease is made, the premises must in substance already be configured for residential use or for combined residential and other use. If the tenant independently converts the premises for residential use after the lease is made, the Act may not apply unless there are special circumstances, such as the landlord having consented to the conversion.
Q. Can foreign nationals or overseas Koreans receive protection under the Housing Lease Protection Act?
According to the examples, a foreign national may receive protection by completing foreign resident registration and reporting a change of place of stay, which take the place of resident registration and a move-in report. For overseas Koreans, the examples explain the procedure of filing a domestic residence report for the location of the leased home. Other requirements, such as delivery of the home, must also be checked in each case.
Q. Can a home that a company rents as employee accommodation be protected?
A corporation that qualifies as a small or medium-sized enterprise under the Framework Act on Small and Medium Enterprises may be entitled to a defense against third parties if it leases a home for an employee to live in and an employee selected by the corporation takes delivery of the home and completes resident registration. The examples also state that, to obtain priority in repayment, the lease agreement between the corporation and the landlord must have a fixed date.
Q. Does the Housing Lease Protection Act apply if I stay for a long time at an inn or lodging facility?
The Act does not apply where it is clear that the lease is for temporary use, as with a lodging contract between a lodging business operator and a guest. However, if the building’s actual structure and use are residential and the contract is not for temporary use, its designation in official records as an inn or similar facility alone does not determine whether the Act applies.
Q. Is a lease valid even if the landlord is not the registered owner?
The Housing Lease Protection Act may apply even if the landlord is not the owner, provided the landlord has legal authority to enter into the lease. However, a tenant cannot obtain priority in repayment if they entered into a lease with someone who lacked authority to lease the property, such as the highest bidder at an auction who has not yet paid the sale price.
Q. Can I receive protection as a small-amount tenant if I move into a debtor’s home as a tenant to recover a debt?
Protection may be unavailable if the primary purpose of the lease is not actually to use and benefit from the home, but to recover a debt or receive payment ahead of senior secured creditors. The examples also explain that a person who leases a home with the landlord and tenant’s intent to abuse the minimum-priority repayment system is not protected as a small-amount tenant.
Q. Can I receive priority in repayment of my deposit if the land is auctioned separately while the house remains in place?
The precedents cited in the examples explain that a tenant who has satisfied the requirements for enforceability against third parties and obtained a fixed date, as well as a small-amount tenant, may exercise a right to priority in repayment from the proceeds of the land even if only the land, separately from the leased home, is auctioned. The examples also explain that a right to priority in repayment from the land may be recognized even for an unregistered home.
Relevant laws
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 1 (주택임대차보호법 제1조)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 2 (주택임대차보호법 제2조)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3, Paragraph 1 (주택임대차보호법 제3조 제1항)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3, Paragraph 3 (주택임대차보호법 제3조 제3항)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3-2, Paragraph 1 (주택임대차보호법 제3조의2 제1항)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 3-2, Paragraph 2 (주택임대차보호법 제3조의2 제2항)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 8 (주택임대차보호법 제8조)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 11 (주택임대차보호법 제11조)
- Housing Lease Protection Act, Article 12 (주택임대차보호법 제12조)
- Act on the Immigration and Legal Status of Overseas Koreans, Article 2 (재외동포의 출입국과 법적 지위에 관한 법률 제2조)
- Act on the Immigration and Legal Status of Overseas Koreans, Article 3 (재외동포의 출입국과 법적 지위에 관한 법률 제3조)
- Act on the Immigration and Legal Status of Overseas Koreans, Article 6 (재외동포의 출입국과 법적 지위에 관한 법률 제6조)
- Act on the Immigration and Legal Status of Overseas Koreans, Article 7 (재외동포의 출입국과 법적 지위에 관한 법률 제7조)
- Act on the Immigration and Legal Status of Overseas Koreans, Article 10 (재외동포의 출입국과 법적 지위에 관한 법률 제10조)
- Immigration Act, Article 31 (출입국관리법 제31조)
Watch out for
- Do not determine whether the Act applies solely from the use designation in the building register or land registry; consider the building’s structure and actual use when the lease was made.
- If the tenant converted the premises for residential use after the lease was made, it may be important to determine whether the premises were already configured for residential use when the lease was made and whether the landlord consented.
- Even if the tenant actually used the home and resided there, protection may be unavailable if the primary purpose of the lease is found to have been debt recovery or abuse of the minimum-priority repayment system.
- Whether a property is a home covered by the Act is a separate question from whether the tenant has acquired enforceability against third parties or a right to priority in repayment. Depending on the case, requirements such as delivery of the home, resident registration or an equivalent report, and a fixed date must be checked.
Source cases
This guide was compiled by AI from the following Korea Legal Aid Corporation consultation cases (in Korean).
- 임치주택의 일부를 점포로 운영한 경우 주택임대차보호법 적용되는지
- 미등기주택을 임차한 경우 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 재외동포도 주택임대차보호법의 보호를 받는지
- 옥탑을 주거용으로 임차한 경우 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 주택임대차보호법상 임차인의 지위를 강화하기 위하여 별도의 전세권설정계약을 체결한 경우
- 외국인의 경우도 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 개정법과 소액임차인의 최우선변제권
- 직원 숙소로 회사가 임차한 주택도 주택임대차보호법 적용되는지
- 주택임대차보호법 제3조의2 제1항의 해석(1)
- 임차 후 비로소 주거용 건물로 개조한 경우도 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 주택임대차보호법 제3조의2 제1항의 해석(2)
- 미등기 전세계약에도 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 비주거용 건물에 주거의 목적으로 일부를 사용하는 경우에 주택임대차보호법의 적용여부
- 임대인이 주택의 명의신탁자인 경우, 임차인이 주택임대차보호법의 보호를 받을 수 있는지
- 채권회수를 위한 임대차계약의 경우, 임차인에게 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 부당한 이득을 취하기 위하여 임대차계약을 체결한 경우에 주택임대차보호법에서 보호하는 소액임차인에 해당하는지 여부
- 적법한 임대권한이 없는 사람과 임대차계약을 체결한 경우 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 일시사용임대차에도 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지
- 공부상 단층 작업소 및 근린생활시설인 경우에 주택임대차보호법 적용여부
- 주택임대차보호법의 적용대상인 주거용 건물인지 여부의 판단기준
- 무허가 건물의 경우에 주택임대차보호법이 적용되는지 여부
- 임대차계약 종료 후 재계약을 하거나 임대차계약 종료 전 당사자의 합의로 차임 등이 증액된 경우 주택임대차보호법 제7조 의 적용...
- 법인의 경우에도 주택임대차보호법의 보호 대상인지 여부
- 주택임대차보호법의 적용대상인 ‘주거용 건물’에 대지도 포함되는지
- 1989.12.30.자로 개정된 주택임대차보호법 제4조 의 적용과 같은 날짜로 묵시적으로 갱신된 임대차계약의 존속기간
This guide is general legal information about Korean law, not legal advice for your situation. For a specific case, consult a lawyer or the Korea Legal Aid Corporation (call 132 in Korea).
